I stared at the differences first, which was a dead end for a while.
First, convert all terms to a common format (e.g., fractions or decimals) to spot patterns. Look for relationships between consecutive terms, such as differences, ratios, or linear combinations. Once a rule is hypothesized, verify it against all given terms, then apply it to find the next two terms.
Pro tip: In trading interviews, it's not just about the answer; it's about demonstrating a systematic, verifiable process. Clearly state your assumptions and show how you test them, as this mirrors debugging and hypothesis testing in software engineering.
Convert all terms to a consistent format (e.g., improper fractions or decimals) to simplify pattern recognition. For example, 3/2 becomes 1.5, 9½ becomes 9.5, etc.
Check differences, ratios, or alternating patterns. Compute first and second differences, or ratios between consecutive terms, to see if they form a recognizable sequence.
Based on observed patterns, propose a rule that generates each term from previous ones. Consider linear recurrences, polynomial fits, or combinations of arithmetic operations.
Test the hypothesized rule against all given terms to ensure it holds. If it fails, refine or discard the hypothesis and try another pattern.
Once a valid rule is confirmed, apply it to the last term(s) to generate the next two terms in the sequence.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.