I spent the first few minutes just restating the problem back to make sure I had the scanning order right, which actually helped because I initially assumed you'd place greedily without caring about holes.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and assumptions, then walk through a concrete example to illustrate the scanning and placement logic. Discuss the algorithm step-by-step, covering scanning order, tie-breaking, complexity, and edge cases, and finally propose optimizations or alternative approaches.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the scanning order (row-major) and tie-breaking (first valid position) are explicitly defined, so no ambiguity exists; instead, focus on optimizing the search using techniques like precomputed pattern bounding boxes or skipping invalid positions.
Ask about grid dimensions, pattern sizes, pattern shapes (including holes), and whether patterns can be placed partially outside. Confirm the scanning order and tie-breaking rules.
Describe scanning the grid row by row, and for each cell, checking if the pattern fits without overlap or out-of-bounds. If valid, place it and mark cells with the pattern index; otherwise, continue scanning.
Discuss time complexity: O(P * n * m * k) where P is number of patterns and k is pattern area. Cover edge cases: patterns larger than grid, holey patterns, empty patterns, and patterns that cannot be placed.
Suggest improvements like precomputing pattern bounding boxes, using a hash set for filled cells, or skipping rows/columns based on pattern dimensions to reduce unnecessary checks.
Reiterate the algorithm, its correctness, and trade-offs. Mention that the solution is straightforward but can be optimized for large inputs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.