← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Apr 2026Remote

Summary

OpenAI ML Engineer interview with a numerical computing question that sounds straightforward until you're actually sitting there trying to remember why max-subtraction matters. Pretty technical, no fluff.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Implement a numerically stable softmax function for a 2D NumPy array using vectorized operations, then discuss its complexity, overflow behavior, and how you'd scale it to GPU.

Technical Trade-offsAlgorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

I knew the subtract-max trick going in but fumbled explaining *why* it works without a loop.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by writing the numerically stable softmax using the max-subtraction trick, then explain its time and space complexity. Next, discuss overflow behavior and how the max-subtraction prevents it, and finally outline a GPU scaling strategy using frameworks like CuPy or custom CUDA kernels.

Pro tip: Mention that the max-subtraction trick is mathematically equivalent to the original softmax but avoids overflow, and that for GPU scaling, memory bandwidth is often the bottleneck, so optimizing memory access patterns is crucial.

1. Implement stable softmax

Write a vectorized NumPy function that subtracts the row-wise maximum before exponentiation and normalization. Use np.max with axis=1 and keepdims=True to maintain broadcasting.

2. Analyze complexity

State that time complexity is O(n*m) for an n x m array, and space complexity is O(n*m) due to intermediate arrays. Mention that it's fully vectorized with no Python loops.

3. Discuss overflow behavior

Explain that without max-subtraction, large inputs cause overflow in exp, leading to inf or NaN. The max-subtraction ensures the largest exponent is 0, preventing overflow.

4. Scale to GPU

Describe using CuPy for a drop-in replacement, or writing custom CUDA kernels. Highlight the need for parallel reduction for max and sum, and consider memory coalescing and using shared memory.

5. Address trade-offs

Mention that while GPU offers massive parallelism, kernel launch overhead and memory transfer costs matter. For small arrays, CPU might be faster; for large batches, GPU is beneficial.

Key Points to Mention

  • Max-subtraction trick for numerical stability
  • Vectorized operations using NumPy broadcasting
  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Overflow and underflow prevention
  • GPU implementation with CuPy or CUDA
  • Memory bandwidth and parallel reduction considerations

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.