← Capital One Interview Insights
The core logic isn't hard but I almost forgot the 1-indexed part and was about to write a bounds check that was off by one.
Start by clarifying the requirements and edge cases, then design a class that stores balances in a 1-indexed array (or adjust indices) and implements each operation with validation checks. For each operation, validate the account number and sufficient funds before mutating state, returning false immediately if any check fails. Finally, discuss time and space complexity and potential concurrency considerations.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a 1-indexed array by allocating size n+1 and ignoring index 0, which simplifies index validation and matches the problem statement. Also, emphasize that validation must happen before any state change to ensure atomicity.
Ask about input constraints, expected return values, and whether operations should be thread-safe. Confirm that account numbers are 1-indexed and that invalid operations should return false without side effects.
Choose an array to store balances, using a 1-indexed approach (e.g., array of size n+1). Discuss why this is efficient for O(1) access and updates.
For each operation, check that the account number is within [1, n] and that any debit (withdraw or transfer source) has sufficient funds. Return false immediately if validation fails.
Write deposit, withdraw, and transfer methods that perform the validated updates. For transfer, validate both accounts and sufficient funds before modifying either balance.
State that all operations are O(1) time and O(n) space. Mention potential concurrency issues and how to address them (e.g., using locks) if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.