← Atlassian Interview Insights
This was a follow-up to a tree-based LCA problem, so I had the basic idea ready.
Clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose an algorithm that finds all ancestors of each employee and identifies the deepest common ancestor. Discuss trade-offs between different approaches (e.g., BFS vs. DFS, precomputation) and analyze time/space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that the 'deepest' common org should be measured by distance from the employees (or from the roots), and consider if multiple deepest common orgs exist. Also, discuss how to handle cycles or if the graph is not a DAG.
Ask about the input format, whether the DAG is given as an adjacency list, and if employees can belong to multiple orgs. Confirm that 'deepest' means maximum distance from the employees or from the roots.
For each employee, traverse upwards to find all ancestor orgs. Then find the intersection of the two sets and select the one with maximum depth.
If multiple queries are expected, precompute ancestor sets or depths for all orgs. Alternatively, use bidirectional BFS from both employees to find the deepest common ancestor efficiently.
Compare time and space complexity of different approaches. Discuss when to use BFS vs. DFS, and how precomputation affects query time.
Consider cases where employees share no common org, multiple deepest common orgs exist, or the graph has cycles. Discuss how to extend to weighted edges or dynamic updates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.