I knew the prefix/suffix product trick going in, so the core algorithm wasn't the hard part.
Use a two-pass prefix-suffix product approach: first compute prefix products in the output array, then traverse from right to left maintaining a running suffix product to multiply into each position. This achieves O(n) time and O(1) extra space (output array not counted). Discuss edge cases like zeros, negatives, and overflow, and outline unit tests covering these scenarios.
Pro tip: Clarify with the interviewer whether the output array counts towards space complexity; typically it does not, so the solution is considered O(1) extra space. Also, mention that handling zeros requires special care because a single zero makes all other products zero except at the zero's index, and multiple zeros make all products zero.
Confirm that the output array does not count towards extra space, and discuss the implications of no division, O(n) time, and constant extra space. Ask about input size and potential overflow handling.
Explain that you will first compute prefix products (product of all elements before index i) and store them in the output array. Then traverse from right to left, maintaining a running suffix product (product of all elements after index i) and multiply it with the prefix product at each index.
Discuss how zeros affect the product: if there is one zero, only the element at the zero's index gets a non-zero product; if multiple zeros, all products are zero. Negative numbers are handled naturally by multiplication. For overflow, consider using a larger data type or discuss with the interviewer.
Outline test cases: empty array, single element, array with one zero, array with multiple zeros, array with negative numbers, and large numbers to test overflow. Verify that the output matches expected results.
State that time complexity is O(n) and extra space is O(1) (excluding output). Mention that the two-pass approach is optimal and avoids division, which is a common pitfall.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.