← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Machine Learning Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Apr 2026

Summary

Round 3 of the OpenAI MLE loop was a one-hour ML coding session focused on implementing matrix multiplication from scratch in PyTorch, including the backward pass. The main question was recognizable from prep forums but the follow-up involving a parallel scan algorithm was a genuine surprise.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Implement the forward pass and backpropagation for matrix multiplication in PyTorch, given a code skeleton.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Had seen this one floating around online so the forward pass felt manageable.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clearly defining the forward pass for matrix multiplication, then derive the gradients for backpropagation using the chain rule. Implement both using PyTorch tensors and autograd, ensuring the backward pass correctly computes gradients for both inputs.

Pro tip: Emphasize that matrix multiplication is a linear operation, so its gradient is straightforward but must account for the transpose of the other matrix. Also, mention that using PyTorch's autograd can validate your manual implementation.

1. Define the Forward Pass

Implement the forward pass as C = A @ B, where A and B are input matrices. Ensure the dimensions are compatible for matrix multiplication.

2. Derive Gradients

Using the chain rule, derive the gradients: dA = dC @ B.T and dB = A.T @ dC, where dC is the gradient of the loss with respect to C.

3. Implement Backward Pass

Implement the backward function that takes dC and returns dA and dB using the derived formulas. Ensure the shapes match the original inputs.

4. Validate with Autograd

Compare your manual gradients with PyTorch's autograd by creating tensors with requires_grad=True and checking that the gradients match.

5. Handle Edge Cases

Consider batched inputs, non-square matrices, and broadcasting. Ensure your implementation generalizes correctly.

Key Points to Mention

  • Chain rule application for matrix multiplication
  • Gradient formulas: dA = dC @ B.T and dB = A.T @ dC
  • Shape compatibility and broadcasting
  • Use of PyTorch's autograd for validation
  • Efficiency considerations (e.g., avoiding unnecessary transposes)
  • Handling batched matrix multiplication

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Extend your backpropagation implementation using a parallel prefix scan approach (similar to the Hillis-Steele algorithm).

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

This one I had not seen anywhere and it showed.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by explaining the motivation for using parallel prefix scan in backpropagation, such as parallelizing sequential dependencies in RNNs or deep networks. Then outline how the Hillis-Steele algorithm works and how it can be adapted to compute gradients efficiently. Finally, discuss implementation details, trade-offs, and potential optimizations.

Pro tip: Emphasize that while parallel prefix scan can reduce time complexity from O(n) to O(log n) for certain operations, it increases work and memory usage; showing awareness of these trade-offs demonstrates depth. Also, mention that this approach is particularly beneficial for long sequences where parallelism outweighs overhead.

1. Identify sequential dependencies

Analyze the backpropagation algorithm to find operations that are inherently sequential, such as gradient accumulation over time steps in RNNs or residual connections.

2. Map to prefix scan

Express the sequential computation as a prefix scan (inclusive or exclusive) with an appropriate associative operator, such as matrix multiplication or addition.

3. Apply Hillis-Steele algorithm

Implement the parallel prefix scan using the Hillis-Steele approach, which iteratively doubles the stride to compute prefix results in O(log n) steps.

4. Integrate with backpropagation

Replace the sequential loop with the parallel scan, ensuring that gradients are correctly computed and accumulated, and handle any necessary adjustments for reverse-mode differentiation.

5. Analyze performance and trade-offs

Discuss the time and space complexity, parallelization overhead, and suitability for different hardware (e.g., GPUs). Mention potential optimizations like using shared memory or warp-level primitives.

Key Points to Mention

  • Associativity of the operator is crucial for parallel prefix scan; ensure the operation (e.g., matrix multiplication) is associative.
  • Hillis-Steele algorithm achieves O(log n) depth but O(n log n) work, which may be less efficient than sequential for small n.
  • Backpropagation through time (BPTT) in RNNs is a prime candidate for parallelization via prefix scan.
  • Memory usage increases due to storing intermediate prefix results; consider memory-efficient variants like Blelloch's algorithm.
  • Implementation can leverage GPU parallelism, but synchronization and memory bandwidth may become bottlenecks.
  • Correctness must be verified by comparing gradients with the sequential implementation.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.