← Salesforce Interview Insights
My first instinct was greedy, just keep subtracting the largest power of 2 that fits.
Recognize that this is a shortest path problem on integers where edges represent adding or subtracting powers of 2. Use BFS from n to 0, but optimize by considering only the nearest powers of 2 to the current value, as moving to a farther power would be suboptimal. Alternatively, derive a greedy strategy based on binary representation, but verify with BFS for small n.
Pro tip: Mention that the problem can be solved in O(log n) time by observing that the optimal strategy is to either round up or down to the nearest power of 2 at each step, and this can be computed using a recursive formula. This shows you can optimize beyond brute force.
Confirm that in each operation you can add or subtract any power of 2 (including 2^0=1) from the current number, and you want the minimum number of operations to reach exactly 0. Ask if n can be up to 10^9 or larger to determine the required efficiency.
View each integer as a node, with edges to n ± 2^k for all k. The goal is the shortest path from n to 0. This suggests BFS, but the graph is infinite, so we need to bound the search space.
Argue that from any number x, the optimal move is to add or subtract the largest power of 2 less than or equal to x, or the smallest power of 2 greater than x. Moving to a farther power is never beneficial because it overshoots and requires more steps to correct.
Define f(n) as the minimum operations. If n is a power of 2, f(n)=1. Otherwise, let p be the largest power of 2 ≤ n. Then f(n) = 1 + min(f(n-p), f(p*2 - n) + 1?) Actually, careful: f(n) = 1 + min(f(n-p), f(2p - n)) where 2p is the next power of 2. This leads to an O(log n) algorithm.
Test small values: n=1 -> 1, n=2 -> 1, n=3 -> 2 (3-2=1, 1-1=0), n=4 -> 1, n=5 -> 2 (5-4=1, 1-1=0), n=6 -> 2 (6-4=2, 2-2=0), n=7 -> 2 (7-8=-1? Actually 7+1=8, 8-8=0 -> 2 operations: 7+1=8, 8-8=0). Check n=15: 15+1=16, 16-16=0 -> 2 operations. This matches the pattern.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.