I started with supervised classification which felt natural but the interviewer kept pushing on how you'd even get ground truth labels at scale.
Start by defining what constitutes a fake account and the target metric (count or proportion), then outline a multi-signal detection approach combining behavioral, network, and content features. Propose a sampling strategy that balances statistical rigor with operational feasibility, and describe validation using labeled data and sensitivity analyses.
Pro tip: Acknowledge that no single method is perfect and propose a triangulation approach, combining multiple estimates to bound the true value. Also, emphasize the importance of aligning with business definitions and avoiding over-engineering by starting with a simple, interpretable model.
Clarify what qualifies as a fake account (e.g., bots, duplicate accounts, compromised accounts) and whether the goal is to estimate the total number or proportion. Align with stakeholders on the operational definition and the desired precision.
List potential signals from user behavior (e.g., posting frequency, login patterns), network (e.g., friend connections, IP addresses), and content (e.g., spammy text, image reuse). Consider both supervised and unsupervised features.
Choose a sampling method (e.g., random, stratified, or cluster sampling) that ensures representativeness and efficiency. Account for platform scale by using stratified sampling based on activity levels or regions, and determine sample size for desired confidence intervals.
Train a classifier (e.g., logistic regression, gradient boosting) on labeled data, using cross-validation. Validate with holdout sets and assess performance metrics (precision, recall, AUC). If labels are scarce, use semi-supervised or active learning.
Apply the model to the sample to estimate the proportion of fake accounts, then extrapolate to the population with confidence intervals. Validate via sensitivity analysis, comparing with alternative methods (e.g., capture-recapture, anomaly detection) and manual review of borderline cases.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.