← Optiver Interview Insights

Optiver·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
May 2026

Summary

Optiver coding round for a software engineer role. The problem was a logistics scheduling scenario where you implement a function to assign cargos to planes given capacity and timing constraints. More involved than a typical leetcode problem since you're working within a provided class structure rather than starting from scratch.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You're given a logistics system where orders contain multiple cargos, and planes have fixed departure times and capacities. An order can only be loaded onto planes departing at or after the order's release time, and cargos from one order can be split across planes. Implement a function that determines whether an order can be fully accepted, returns the cargo-to-plane assignment if so, and updates each plane's remaining capacity. A class skeleton with Order, Plane, Cargo, and a Scheduler class is provided.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The setup took me a minute to absorb.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a greedy algorithm that processes orders and planes in chronological order, assigning cargo to the earliest available plane with sufficient capacity. Discuss how to handle splitting cargo across planes and updating capacities, and analyze time complexity and potential edge cases.

Pro tip: Emphasize that the greedy approach is optimal because assigning cargo to earlier planes preserves later capacity for future orders, and mention that you would validate the solution with unit tests covering edge cases like zero capacity or release times.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about input formats, whether planes can be partially filled, if orders can be rejected, and if there are any constraints on splitting cargo (e.g., minimum chunk size). Confirm that planes have fixed departure times and capacities.

2. Design the algorithm

Propose a greedy algorithm: sort planes by departure time, and for each order, iterate through planes departing at or after the order's release time, assigning as much cargo as possible to each plane until the order is fully assigned or no capacity remains.

3. Handle data structures and updates

Use a list of planes with remaining capacities, and for each order, create a mapping of cargo to plane assignments. Update plane capacities after each assignment. Consider using a priority queue or balanced tree for efficient plane lookup if needed.

4. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

Discuss time complexity (e.g., O(P log P + O * P) where P is number of planes and O is number of orders) and space complexity. Mention alternative approaches like dynamic programming or max-flow, and justify why greedy is suitable here.

5. Test and validate

Walk through edge cases: order release time after all departures, insufficient total capacity, exact capacity match, multiple orders competing for same planes. Suggest unit tests and potential optimizations.

Key Points to Mention

  • Greedy assignment is optimal because using earlier planes leaves later planes available for future orders.
  • Splitting cargo across planes requires tracking partial assignments and updating remaining capacities.
  • Time complexity: sorting planes O(P log P), then for each order iterate through planes O(O * P).
  • Edge cases: no planes available, total capacity insufficient, order release time after last departure.
  • Data structures: use a list of planes with remaining capacity, and a map for cargo-to-plane assignments.
  • Trade-offs: greedy is simple and efficient, but if constraints change (e.g., cargo cannot be split), a different approach may be needed.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.