← Molocoads Interview Insights
The naive approach is obvious and they probably expect you to dismiss it quickly.
Use a stack to process characters one by one, maintaining counts of consecutive identical characters. When the count reaches k, pop the group from the stack. This yields an O(n) solution because each character is pushed and popped at most once.
Pro tip: After explaining the stack approach, mention that this is essentially a run-length encoding with a stack, and that the same technique can be used for similar problems like removing adjacent duplicates. Also, clarify that the removal can cascade, so you must continue checking after a pop.
Confirm that groups of exactly k adjacent identical characters are removed, and that removal can cause new groups to form, requiring repeated passes until no such group exists.
Recognize that a naive simulation with multiple passes could be O(n^2) or worse, so we need a linear-time approach.
Use a stack where each element stores a character and its current consecutive count. For each character in the input, if it matches the top, increment the count; otherwise push with count 1. If the count reaches k, pop the element.
Explain that each character is pushed and popped at most once, so the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n) in the worst case.
Walk through a small example, such as s = 'deeedbbcccbdaa', k = 3, to demonstrate how the stack handles cascading removals.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.