The line-number semantics tripped me up more than I expected.
Clarify the event format and edge-case semantics first, then propose a straightforward list-based simulation with careful index normalization and bounds checking. Walk through a small example to validate the logic, and discuss complexity and potential optimizations like a balanced tree or rope for large inputs.
Pro tip: Explicitly state your assumptions about 1-indexing and edge-case behavior (e.g., inserting at line 0 means prepend, inserting past end appends, deleting past end removes available lines) before coding, and ask the interviewer to confirm—this shows attention to detail and prevents wasted effort.
Ask about the exact event format, whether positions are 1-indexed, and the expected behavior for edge cases like inserting at 0, inserting past the end, deleting past the end, and empty documents. Confirm whether empty content lists are allowed and how they should be handled.
Decide on a simple list (array) for clarity, or a more efficient structure like a balanced BST or rope if performance matters. Outline the algorithm: iterate through events, convert 1-indexed positions to 0-indexed, clamp positions to valid range, and perform insert or delete operations.
Trace a small example with several events, including edge cases, to verify the logic and demonstrate correctness. Show how the document changes after each event.
Discuss time and space complexity of the chosen approach. For a list, insertion/deletion is O(n) per event, leading to O(m*n) total. Mention alternatives like a balanced tree or rope that can achieve O(log n) per operation, and when they might be preferable.
Enumerate all edge cases and describe how your code handles them: inserting at line 0 (prepend), inserting past the end (append), deleting past the end (delete to end), deleting from an empty document (no-op), and empty content lists (no-op).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.