← Coursera Interview Insights

Coursera·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
May 2026

Summary

Coursera software engineer interview with a voting algorithm problem. Pretty clean coding question, nothing too exotic, but the tie-breaking condition is the kind of thing that'll bite you if you're not careful.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a list of ranked ballots where each ballot is an ordered list of candidate names, implement plurality voting by counting only the first choice on each ballot and returning the candidate with the most votes. If there's a tie, return the lexicographically smallest candidate name.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

The core counting part is straightforward, just a frequency map over the first element of each ballot.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the input format and edge cases, then propose a single-pass hash map solution that counts first choices and tracks the best candidate using a tie-breaking rule. Walk through the algorithm, analyze time and space complexity, and test with examples including ties and empty ballots.

Pro tip: Explicitly handle edge cases like empty ballot list or ballots with no candidates, and mention that the tie-breaking rule can be integrated into the comparison logic to avoid a separate sorting step.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Ask about input format, empty ballots, and whether candidate names are case-sensitive. Confirm that ties are broken by lexicographical order.

2. Design the algorithm

Use a hash map to count first-choice votes. Iterate through ballots, skip empty ones, and update counts. Track the current winner, updating when a candidate has more votes or equal votes but a lexicographically smaller name.

3. Analyze complexity

State that time complexity is O(N) where N is the number of ballots, and space complexity is O(C) where C is the number of unique candidates.

4. Test with examples

Walk through a simple case, a tie case, and an edge case like empty ballots or all ballots empty. Verify the output matches expectations.

5. Discuss potential optimizations or variations

Mention that if ballots are large, we only need the first element, so no need to process the rest. Also note that the tie-breaking could be done by sorting candidates at the end, but the integrated approach is more efficient.

Key Points to Mention

  • Use a hash map to count first-choice votes efficiently.
  • Integrate tie-breaking by comparing candidate names lexicographically during the scan.
  • Handle edge cases: empty ballot list, ballots with no candidates, and all ballots empty.
  • Time complexity O(N) and space complexity O(C).
  • Avoid sorting all candidates by maintaining the winner on the fly.
  • Clarify assumptions about input format and candidate name uniqueness.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.