This one shows up in previous reports so I wasn't totally blindsided.
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, read/write ratio, custom aliases, expiration) and then design a scalable system using a unique ID generator (e.g., Snowflake) and base62 encoding. Discuss trade-offs of different approaches (hashing vs. counter) and be prepared to extend with analytics, rate limiting, or ML-driven features like spam detection or personalized short links.
Pro tip: For an ML Engineer role, proactively suggest how ML could enhance the service—e.g., predicting malicious URLs, optimizing cache eviction, or personalizing link recommendations—to show domain expertise and business impact.
Ask about expected traffic (QPS), read/write ratio, latency requirements, custom aliases, expiration, and analytics needs. Confirm whether the service is internal or public, and discuss data retention and privacy constraints.
Outline the core components: API gateway, encoding service, ID generator, database (SQL/NoSQL), cache (Redis), and analytics pipeline. Explain the flow for shortening and redirecting, and how to ensure uniqueness and scalability.
Detail the ID generation strategy (e.g., distributed counter, Snowflake, or hash with collision handling) and base62 encoding. Discuss database schema, indexing, and caching strategy (e.g., LRU, TTL). Address trade-offs between consistency and availability.
For follow-ups like analytics, rate limiting, or spam detection, propose ML solutions: e.g., a classifier for malicious URLs, anomaly detection for traffic spikes, or reinforcement learning for cache optimization. Explain how to integrate models into the serving path without adding latency.
Cover horizontal scaling, database sharding, replication, and failover. Mention monitoring (latency, error rates, cache hit ratio) and how to handle hot keys. If ML models are used, discuss model versioning, retraining, and A/B testing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.