← Goldman Sachs Interview Insights
Got the base DP working fine, that part was almost muscle memory.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and edge cases, then explain the dynamic programming recurrence: dp[i][j] = grid[i][j] + min(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]). Implement the O(m*n) solution, then discuss space optimization by either modifying the grid in-place or using a rolling array of size n, highlighting trade-offs.
Pro tip: At Goldman Sachs, interviewers value clean, efficient code and awareness of real-world constraints. Mention that in-place modification saves memory but mutates input, while a rolling array preserves input but uses O(n) extra space—choose based on whether the input can be modified.
Restate the problem, confirm movement directions (right/down only), and discuss edge cases like empty grid or single row/column.
Derive the recurrence: dp[i][j] = grid[i][j] + min(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]), with base cases for first row and column.
Code the DP using a 2D array, ensuring time and space complexity are O(m*n). Walk through a small example.
Explain two approaches: in-place modification of the grid (O(1) extra space) or a rolling array of size n (O(n) extra space). Discuss trade-offs.
Summarize time and space complexity, mention potential follow-ups (e.g., obstacles, larger grids), and confirm solution correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.