Straightforward groupby, but the OR condition is where people trip up.
First, aggregate the orders table by customer ID to compute order count and total spend. Then filter customers where order count < 2 OR total spend < 100, and return the list of customer IDs.
Pro tip: Always clarify the definition of 'total spend' (e.g., sum of order amounts) and consider edge cases like customers with no orders or null values. Also, mention that you would validate the result with a quick sanity check.
Inspect the orders table to identify columns: customer ID, order amount, and any other relevant fields. Check for missing values or data types.
Group by customer ID and compute the number of orders (count) and total spend (sum of order amounts).
Filter the aggregated DataFrame to include customers where order count < 2 OR total spend < 100.
Select the customer ID column from the filtered DataFrame and return it as a list or Series.
Sanity-check the result (e.g., count of customers) and discuss potential edge cases like customers with zero orders.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
The month-level groupby is fine but getting exactly top 5 per month tripped me up a bit.
Start by clarifying the data schema and assumptions (e.g., order date, customer ID, order cost). Then, for each month, compute the total orders and total cost per customer, rank them, and select the top 5 for each metric. Finally, write efficient Python code using pandas groupby and rank functions to produce both rankings.
Pro tip: Mention handling ties explicitly—decide whether to include all tied customers or use a deterministic tie-breaker (e.g., customer ID) to ensure consistent results. Also, consider scalability: if data is large, suggest using window functions in SQL or distributed computing (e.g., Spark) instead of pandas.
Ask about the data schema, time zone for 'calendar month', and how to handle ties. Confirm whether 'total order cost' means sum of order amounts or something else.
Group the data by month and customer, then compute total orders (count) and total cost (sum). Ensure the month is extracted correctly from the order date.
For each month, rank customers by total orders and by total cost separately. Use descending order so the highest values get rank 1.
Filter the ranked data to keep only rows where rank <= 5 for each metric. Handle ties appropriately based on the clarified requirements.
Output two separate tables or dataframes: one for top 5 by orders, one for top 5 by cost. Optionally, combine into a single structure with a 'metric' column.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
pivot_table with aggfunc='sum' and fill_value=0.
Start by clarifying the input data schema (e.g., transaction-level table with cust_id, product_type, amount). Then describe a pivot operation: group by cust_id and product_type, sum the spend, and reshape to wide format using a pivot or conditional aggregation. Finally, discuss handling missing values (fill with 0) and ensuring the output has one row per customer.
Pro tip: Mention that in a production environment, you'd consider scalability (e.g., using Spark or efficient SQL) and that you'd validate the output by spot-checking a few customers against raw data.
Ask about the structure of the source data: is it a transaction table with columns like cust_id, product_type, and amount? Confirm that each row represents a purchase.
Group the data by cust_id and product_type, then sum the amount to get total spend for each combination.
Use a pivot operation (e.g., pandas pivot_table, SQL PIVOT, or conditional aggregation) to turn product_type values into columns, with cust_id as the index.
Replace NaN with 0 for customers who didn't purchase a product, and reset the index so cust_id becomes a column. Ensure the output has exactly the required columns.
Verify the result by checking a few customers manually. If data is large, mention using distributed computing (e.g., Spark) or efficient SQL.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.