← faire Interview Insights

faire·Software Engineer·Onsite - System Design / Architecture·Senior

SeniorRejected
May 2026

Summary

Did a system design round at Faire for a software engineer role and got rejected because my solution was apparently too complicated. Came in with a data infra background and thought that would work in my favor. It did not.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design a 'like' system for brands. Cover the high-level design, API, data model, and how you'd scale it.

System DesignTechnical Trade-offsData Modeling
Author's notes

I went pretty deep here.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements and scale (e.g., read-heavy, eventual consistency acceptable), then outline a high-level design with a focus on scalability and data modeling. Structure your answer by covering API design, data model, and scaling strategies, and discuss trade-offs at each step.

Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and eventual consistency for likes, and discuss how you'd handle hot partitions and celebrity brands with sharding or caching. Also, mention monitoring and metrics to detect anomalies.

1. Clarify Requirements and Scale

Ask questions to understand expected read/write ratio, latency requirements, consistency needs, and scale (e.g., number of brands, users, likes per second). This ensures your design meets actual needs.

2. High-Level Design

Sketch the main components: clients, API gateway, like service, database, cache, and message queue. Explain the flow of a like/unlike request and how data is stored and retrieved.

3. API Design

Define RESTful endpoints (e.g., POST /brands/{id}/like, DELETE /brands/{id}/like, GET /brands/{id}/likes) with idempotency keys and appropriate status codes. Discuss authentication and rate limiting.

4. Data Model

Propose a schema: a likes table with user_id, brand_id, timestamp, and a unique constraint on (user_id, brand_id). Consider a separate counter table or denormalized count for fast reads, and discuss trade-offs.

5. Scaling Strategy

Address scaling: shard by brand_id or user_id, use caching (e.g., Redis) for counts, employ async processing via queues for writes, and handle hot partitions with techniques like sharding by brand_id + time bucket.

Key Points to Mention

  • Idempotency of like/unlike operations to handle retries and duplicate requests.
  • Eventual consistency vs strong consistency trade-offs for like counts.
  • Sharding strategies to distribute load and avoid hot partitions (e.g., shard by brand_id or user_id).
  • Caching frequently accessed like counts to reduce database load.
  • Asynchronous processing of like events using a message queue for scalability.
  • Monitoring and metrics to track system health and detect anomalies.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.