← Instacart Interview Insights
I went with recursive descent because I can never remember the two-stack approach under pressure, and it felt more natural to reason about.
Use a two-stack approach (operators and operands) or recursive descent parser to evaluate the expression while respecting precedence and associativity. Handle unary minus by treating it as a special operator or by converting to a binary operation with a leading zero. Validate parentheses and division by zero, and use 64-bit integers with truncating division.
Pro tip: Clarify the expected behavior for edge cases like unary minus in different contexts (e.g., '--5' or '5*-3') and integer division truncation (toward zero). Mention that you'd write unit tests for these cases to ensure correctness.
Ask about input constraints, expected output type, handling of unary minus, division truncation, and error reporting. Confirm that spaces should be ignored and that parentheses must be balanced.
Decide between two-stack (shunting-yard) and recursive descent. Explain the trade-offs: two-stack is iterative and straightforward for precedence, while recursive descent is elegant and extensible.
Describe how to process tokens: push operands, compare operator precedence, apply operators, handle parentheses, and manage unary minus. Include error checks for mismatched parentheses and division by zero.
State time complexity O(n) and space O(n) for both approaches. Discuss edge cases like unary minus at start or after operator, nested parentheses, and integer overflow (though 64-bit may suffice).
Concisely recap the approach and complexity, then offer to implement the solution in code if desired, showing readiness to dive deeper.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.