This looked like a clean textbook question at first and I thought I had it.
Start by clearly defining the metric and the estimand (absolute lift), then walk through the point estimate, standard error, and CI formula step by step. After covering absolute lift, explain how to transform to relative lift and discuss the assumptions and alternatives when the normal approximation is questionable.
Pro tip: Always state the assumptions behind the normal approximation (e.g., large sample sizes, independent observations) and mention that in practice you'd check with a bootstrap or use a score interval when conversion rates are extreme or sample sizes are small.
Clarify that the treatment effect is the difference in conversion rates: p_t - p_c. Compute the point estimate as the difference in observed proportions.
Under independence, the variance of the difference is the sum of variances: Var(p_t) + Var(p_c). Estimate each variance as p(1-p)/n using the observed proportions, then take the square root to get the standard error.
Use the formula: (p_t - p_c) ± 1.96 * SE. Explain that 1.96 is the critical value from the standard normal for 95% confidence.
For relative lift, the point estimate is (p_t - p_c) / p_c. The standard error can be approximated using the delta method: SE_rel ≈ SE_abs / p_c. Then the CI is relative_lift ± 1.96 * SE_rel.
The normal approximation may be poor when sample sizes are small or conversion rates are near 0 or 1 (e.g., np < 5 or n(1-p) < 5). In such cases, use a bootstrap (resample users and recompute the difference) or a score-based interval (e.g., Wilson score interval for each proportion and combine).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.