The part that got me was the adjacency list direction.
Model the services and their dependencies as a directed graph, then perform a traversal (BFS or DFS) starting from the shut-down services to find all reachable nodes. The reachable set represents all services that become unavailable, including transitive dependencies.
Pro tip: Clarify edge direction upfront: if service A depends on B, the edge should point from A to B (dependent to dependency) so that traversal from shut-down services follows reverse edges to find dependents. Also discuss handling cycles and large-scale graphs with millions of services.
Confirm the input format (list of services, dependency pairs), whether the graph is directed, and if there are any constraints like cycles or multiple shut-down services. Ask if the output should include the initially shut-down services.
Represent services as nodes and dependencies as directed edges. Decide the edge direction: typically, if service A depends on B, add an edge from A to B (or reverse for traversal). Build an adjacency list for efficient traversal.
Perform BFS or DFS starting from all shut-down services. For each service, follow edges to its dependents (reverse edges if needed) and mark visited nodes. Continue until no new services are reached.
Use a visited set to avoid infinite loops in cyclic dependencies. Ensure each affected service is added only once to the result.
State time complexity O(V+E) and space O(V+E). Discuss iterative vs recursive DFS (stack overflow risk), and potential optimizations for distributed systems or large graphs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.