I spent the first few minutes just simulating it on paper to convince myself I understood the operation correctly, which was probably the right call.
First, clarify the operation: it's a rotation of the first element to the end followed by a leftward bubble sort pass. Then, recognize that the minimum number of operations is the minimum number of elements that need to be moved to achieve a sorted array, which can be found by identifying the longest non-decreasing subsequence that can remain in place. Finally, check if the remaining elements can be moved to their correct positions via the operation, and return the count or -1 if impossible.
Pro tip: Don't jump into coding; first walk through a small example to ensure you understand the operation, and discuss edge cases like already sorted arrays or duplicates. This shows structured problem-solving and communication skills valued at IBM.
Restate the operation in your own words: take the first element, move it to the end, then bubble it left past larger elements until it's in sorted position. Confirm with the interviewer if needed.
The goal is to make the array non-decreasing with minimum operations. Each operation moves one element to its correct position relative to the sorted order, but may disrupt others.
The elements that are already in non-decreasing order and can remain in place form a subsequence. The minimum operations is the number of elements not in this subsequence, provided the remaining elements can be moved to the end in the correct order.
After removing the subsequence, the remaining elements must be able to be moved to the end in non-decreasing order. This is possible if the remaining elements are already in non-decreasing order when considered in the order they appear. If not, return -1.
If feasible, return the number of operations (size of remaining elements). Otherwise, return -1.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.