I started with the data model, which felt safe, then moved into the API surface.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a clean data model and API contract. Walk through storage, concurrency, and ID generation choices with trade-offs, and finish with performance and testing considerations. Emphasize simplicity and extensibility, aligning with Amazon's leadership principles.
Pro tip: Proactively discuss trade-offs (e.g., in-memory vs. persistent storage, locking vs. lock-free) and tie decisions to business needs like scalability and reliability. This shows you think like an owner, not just a coder.
Ask about expected scale (tasks per user, concurrent users), persistence needs, and whether this is a single-user or multi-user system. Confirm functional and non-functional requirements.
Specify a Task entity with fields like id, title, description, status, createdAt, completedAt. Outline core API methods: addTask, completeTask, getIncompleteTasks, getCompletedTasks, getTaskById.
Decide between in-memory (e.g., HashMap) and persistent storage (e.g., database). Discuss thread safety using synchronized collections, locks, or concurrent data structures, and justify based on scale and consistency needs.
Propose ID generation (UUID, auto-increment, Snowflake) with trade-offs. Analyze time complexity of operations and suggest indexing or caching for performance.
Describe unit tests for each API, concurrency tests to ensure thread safety, and integration tests if using a database. Mention edge cases like duplicate IDs and invalid task IDs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.