← J.P. Morgan Interview Insights
I knew to sort first, which helped, but I fumbled on the touching-endpoint case for a bit.
Start by clarifying that intervals touching at a single point should be merged (e.g., [1,2] and [2,3] become [1,3]). Then sort intervals by start time and iterate through them, merging when the current interval's start is less than or equal to the last merged interval's end. Finally, return the merged list, which is already sorted by start.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting is the key to achieving O(n log n) time, and that in-place merging can save space if the input can be modified. Also, discuss edge cases like empty input or single interval to show thoroughness.
Confirm that intervals touching at a single point should be merged, and ask about input format, output format, and constraints. Consider edge cases: empty array, single interval, all overlapping, none overlapping.
Sort the intervals based on their start values. This ensures that any overlapping intervals will be adjacent, simplifying the merging process.
Initialize a result list with the first interval. For each subsequent interval, if its start is less than or equal to the end of the last interval in the result, merge them by updating the end to the maximum of the two ends. Otherwise, add the interval to the result.
After processing all intervals, return the result list. Since we sorted by start and merged in order, the result is already sorted by start.
State that time complexity is O(n log n) due to sorting, and space complexity is O(n) for the output (or O(1) extra if merging in-place). Mention that in-place merging is possible if the input can be modified.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.