The push/pop/top part I had down immediately.
Start by clarifying the requirements and edge cases, then propose a solution using two stacks (one for values, one for maximums) to achieve O(1) for push, pop, top, and peekMax, while popMax requires O(n) in the worst case. Discuss the trade-offs and consider if a more optimized approach (e.g., using a balanced BST or doubly linked list with a max-heap) is warranted, but emphasize the simplicity and efficiency of the two-stack method for most operations.
Pro tip: Mention that the two-stack approach is elegant but popMax is O(n); if the interviewer pushes for optimization, suggest a doubly linked list combined with a TreeMap to achieve O(log n) for all operations, showing you understand advanced data structures.
Ask about the expected frequency of operations, whether the stack can be empty, and how duplicates should be handled. Confirm that popMax removes the maximum value closest to the top.
Describe the two-stack approach: one stack for all elements, another to keep track of the maximum values. Explain how each operation works and its time complexity.
State that push, pop, top, and peekMax are O(1), while popMax is O(n) in the worst case due to the need to remove an element from the middle of the stack. Space complexity is O(n).
If required, propose an optimized solution using a doubly linked list and a balanced BST (or TreeMap) to achieve O(log n) for all operations, explaining the trade-offs in complexity and implementation effort.
Reiterate the chosen approach, its complexities, and why it fits the problem constraints. Mention any assumptions made.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.