Took me an embarrassingly long time to get past the brute force instinct.
Use dynamic programming where dp[i][j] represents the side length of the largest square submatrix ending at (i, j). The total count of all squares is the sum of dp[i][j] over all cells, since each cell contributes squares of sizes 1 through dp[i][j].
Pro tip: Mention that this DP approach is optimal with O(m*n) time and O(n) space if optimized, and that it elegantly handles overlapping subproblems. Also, clarify that the sum of dp values gives the total count because each square of size k ending at a cell implies the existence of squares of all smaller sizes ending at the same cell.
Let dp[i][j] be the side length of the largest square submatrix with all 1s that ends at cell (i, j). This state captures the maximum square size ending at each position.
If matrix[i][j] == 1, then dp[i][j] = 1 + min(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1], dp[i-1][j-1]). Otherwise, dp[i][j] = 0. This builds on the fact that a larger square requires smaller squares at the top, left, and top-left.
Initialize a DP table of size m x n (or two rows for space optimization). Iterate through the matrix row by row, computing dp values and accumulating the sum of all dp[i][j] values.
The sum of all dp[i][j] values equals the total number of square submatrices of all sizes, because each cell with dp value k contributes k squares (sizes 1 to k) ending at that cell.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.