← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Did a technical phone screen for a software engineer role at OpenAI. One question, pretty focused, but the edge cases had more depth than I expected going in.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design and implement an in-memory counter for chat activity. You need two methods: one to record a chat event for a given user and chat at a specific timestamp, and one to return how many events for that pair fall within the 15-minute window ending at the most recent recorded timestamp.

System DesignAlgorithms & Data StructuresData Modeling
Author's notes

I jumped straight to a nested hashmap keyed on userId and chatId, storing a sorted list of timestamps underneath.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify requirements and edge cases, then propose a data structure that stores events per (user, chat) pair in a time-ordered list, such as a deque or balanced BST. For the query, use binary search or a sliding window to count events within the 15-minute window ending at the latest timestamp, and discuss trade-offs between time and space complexity.

Pro tip: Explicitly handle out-of-order timestamps and define the window as inclusive of the latest timestamp; mention that if timestamps are monotonically increasing, a deque with amortized O(1) per operation works, otherwise a balanced BST or sorted list with binary search is needed.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Ask about timestamp ordering (monotonic vs arbitrary), whether the window is inclusive, and if multiple events can share the same timestamp. Confirm that the query uses the most recent recorded timestamp for that pair.

2. Choose data structures

Propose a map from (user, chat) to a time-ordered collection of timestamps. For monotonic timestamps, a deque with a sliding window works; for arbitrary timestamps, use a balanced BST or sorted list with binary search.

3. Design record method

Insert the timestamp into the appropriate collection, maintaining order. If using a deque and timestamps are monotonic, append and optionally evict old events; otherwise, insert in sorted order.

4. Design query method

Find the latest timestamp for the pair, then count events with timestamp >= latest - 15 minutes. Use binary search for O(log n) or a sliding window for O(1) amortized if monotonic.

5. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

Discuss time and space complexity for each approach, and how to handle concurrency if needed. Mention that the query is O(log n) or O(1) depending on assumptions.

Key Points to Mention

  • Data structure choice: map of (user, chat) to a time-ordered collection (deque, sorted list, or balanced BST).
  • Handling out-of-order timestamps: insertion in sorted order or using a balanced BST.
  • Window definition: inclusive of the latest timestamp, i.e., [latest - 15 min, latest].
  • Time complexity: record O(log n) or O(1) amortized; query O(log n) or O(1) amortized.
  • Space complexity: O(total number of events) or O(events per pair) if pruning old events.
  • Concurrency considerations: thread-safety with locks or concurrent data structures if needed.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.