The scope feels contained until you actually sit down with it.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a minimal architecture that separates concerns (API, persistence, frontend). Emphasize how you would use an AI coding assistant to accelerate development while ensuring correctness through tests and validation. Conclude by discussing trade-offs and potential improvements.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of financial correctness by highlighting idempotency and atomicity in transaction handling, and mention how you'd use the AI assistant to generate test cases for edge conditions like concurrent debits.
Ask clarifying questions about expected scale, authentication, and whether transactions need to be idempotent. Define the minimal viable features: create credit/debit, view balance, list transactions.
Propose a simple stack (e.g., Node.js/Express + SQLite + React) and outline the API endpoints (POST /transactions, GET /balance, GET /transactions). Discuss data model: accounts and transactions tables with foreign key and constraints.
Explain how you'd use an AI coding assistant to generate boilerplate, API handlers, and frontend components. Emphasize manual review for critical sections like balance validation and transaction atomicity.
Describe input validation (e.g., positive amounts, valid account IDs) and business rule enforcement (prevent negative balances). Mention using database transactions to ensure atomicity and idempotency keys to avoid duplicate submissions.
Outline a testing strategy: unit tests for validation logic, integration tests for API endpoints, and end-to-end tests for the frontend. Include a README with setup instructions, API documentation, and design decisions.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.