← Microsoft Interview Insights
I jumped straight to a trie which felt right, and the interviewer seemed fine with that direction.
Clarify the requirements and constraints, then propose a trie-based solution where each node stores a set of sentence indices. Explain how to handle character input, prefix matching, and sentence insertion when '#' is typed, and discuss trade-offs between different data structures.
Pro tip: Mention that storing sentence indices at each node allows efficient retrieval without duplicating strings, and that using a set ensures uniqueness. Also, note that if ranking by frequency were required, you could store counts at the terminal nodes.
Ask about input size, character set, expected query frequency, and whether sentences can be duplicates. Confirm that results need not be ranked.
Propose a trie (prefix tree) where each node represents a character and stores a set of sentence indices. Alternatively, discuss a sorted list with binary search for prefix ranges.
For input(c): if c == '#', add the current sentence to the trie and reset; else, traverse the trie with the current prefix and return all sentences in the subtree.
Compare trie vs. sorted list: trie offers O(prefix length + output size) query time but higher memory; sorted list uses less memory but O(log n + output size) query time with binary search.
Discuss empty prefix, duplicate sentences, memory optimization (e.g., storing indices instead of strings), and potential concurrency if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.