The key insight I kept circling around was connecting this to shortest common supersequence length.
Model the problem as finding the shortest common supersequence (SCS) of the two sequences and check if its length is ≤ L. Use dynamic programming to compute the SCS length, which is |A| + |B| - LCS(A, B), where LCS is the longest common subsequence. Alternatively, use a two-pointer greedy approach to merge the sequences optimally, but DP is more straightforward for correctness.
Pro tip: Clarify that the problem reduces to the shortest common supersequence, and mention that while DP gives the exact length, a greedy merge can also work if you always take the next character from the sequence that allows the other to catch up. This shows you understand both the theory and practical optimizations.
Restate the problem: given sequences A and B, and integer L, determine if there exists a sequence S of length ≤ L such that both A and B are subsequences of S. This is equivalent to checking if the length of the shortest common supersequence (SCS) of A and B is ≤ L.
Recall that the length of the SCS of A and B is |A| + |B| - |LCS(A, B)|, where LCS is the longest common subsequence. So the problem reduces to computing the LCS length of A and B.
Use dynamic programming to compute the LCS length. Create a 2D table dp[i][j] representing the LCS length of prefixes A[0..i-1] and B[0..j-1]. Fill the table using the recurrence: if A[i-1] == B[j-1], dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1; else dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]).
Compute SCS length as |A| + |B| - dp[|A|][|B|]. If this length is ≤ L, return true; otherwise, return false.
Mention that space can be optimized to O(min(|A|, |B|)) using a 1D DP array. Also note that if L is very large, the answer is trivially true; if L is less than max(|A|, |B|), it's false.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.