← Citadel Interview Insights

Citadel·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Citadel coding interview, one meaty algorithmic problem that's basically a twist on a classic heap question. The added wrinkle of collapsing same-timestamp records before emitting made it more interesting than I expected.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given K sorted lists of timestamped records, merge them into a single sorted stream. The catch: any records sharing the same timestamp across all lists must be combined into one record (e.g. by summing their values) before being emitted. What's your approach and complexity?

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

I recognized the min-heap skeleton pretty fast, but the same-timestamp collapsing part tripped me up for a minute.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use a min-heap to merge the K sorted lists, but when the smallest timestamp is found, collect all records with that timestamp from the heap and from the current heads of all lists, combine them, and emit one record. This ensures duplicates are aggregated before output. Complexity is O(N log K) time and O(K) space, where N is total records.

Pro tip: Emphasize that you must drain all lists of the current minimum timestamp before emitting, and discuss how to handle ties efficiently without degrading to O(N log N).

1. Clarify assumptions and edge cases

Confirm that lists are sorted by timestamp, records have a timestamp and value, and combining means summing values. Ask about duplicate timestamps within a single list and empty lists.

2. Outline the heap-based merge

Initialize a min-heap with the first record from each non-empty list. Repeatedly extract the minimum timestamp, then gather all records with that timestamp from the heap and from the next elements of the lists they came from.

3. Aggregate and emit

Sum the values of all gathered records, emit the combined record, and push the next record from each list that contributed a record with that timestamp back into the heap.

4. Analyze complexity

Time: O(N log K) because each record is pushed and popped once, and heap size is at most K. Space: O(K) for the heap, plus O(1) for aggregation variables.

5. Discuss optimizations and trade-offs

Mention that if timestamps are dense, a bucket or counting approach might be faster, but the heap approach is general and optimal for comparison-based merging.

Key Points to Mention

  • Min-heap of size K to efficiently get the smallest timestamp across lists
  • Handling ties by collecting all records with the same timestamp before emitting
  • Time complexity O(N log K) and space complexity O(K)
  • Edge cases: empty lists, duplicate timestamps within a list, large K
  • Alternative approaches like divide-and-conquer merge or bucket sort if timestamps are bounded
  • Stability and order of combined records if values are not just summed

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.