← Pure Storage Interview Insights
I knew the hash map piece pretty quickly but then stared at getRandom for an embarrassingly long time.
Start by clarifying the requirements: the data structure should support insert, remove, and getRandom in O(1) average time, and we can assume no duplicates. Then propose a hybrid approach using a dynamic array (or list) for O(1) random access and a hash map for O(1) insert/remove by mapping values to their indices. Explain how removal is handled by swapping the element with the last one and updating the hash map.
Pro tip: Mention that getRandom must be truly uniform, so using a hash map alone won't work because iterating over it is O(n). Also, discuss edge cases like removing the last element or when the data structure is empty.
Confirm that all operations must be O(1) average time, that duplicates are not allowed (or discuss handling duplicates), and that getRandom should return each element with equal probability.
Use a dynamic array (e.g., ArrayList in Java, list in Python) for O(1) random access and a hash map (dictionary) to store value-to-index mappings for O(1) lookups.
Append the new element to the array and add its index to the hash map. This is O(1) amortized time.
To remove a value, get its index from the hash map. Swap it with the last element in the array, update the hash map for the swapped element, then remove the last element from both the array and the hash map.
Generate a random index between 0 and array length - 1, and return the element at that index. This is O(1) time and ensures uniform randomness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.