← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Apr 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round, pretty much a classic grid problem with a twist at the end that I didn't fully see coming. The follow-up about large-scale grids is where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

You're given a city map as a grid where 1 represents a building and 0 represents empty land. Two buildings belong to the same community if they are directly adjacent in four directions. How many independent communities exist in the grid?

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

It's Number of Islands, basically.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the grid as a graph where each building cell is a node and edges connect adjacent buildings. Then count the number of connected components using either BFS/DFS or Union-Find, iterating over all cells and incrementing the count when an unvisited building is found.

Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront (empty grid, no buildings, all buildings) and mention that you can optimize space by marking visited cells in-place (e.g., setting to 0) if mutation is allowed, but always confirm with the interviewer.

1. Clarify and Define

Confirm grid dimensions, connectivity (4-directional), and what constitutes a community. Ask about edge cases like empty grid or no buildings.

2. Choose Algorithm

Decide between BFS/DFS (simpler, O(mn) time, O(mn) space for recursion/queue) and Union-Find (good for dynamic connectivity, O(mn α) time). Explain trade-offs.

3. Implement Traversal

Iterate through each cell; when a building is found, increment community count and traverse all connected buildings, marking them visited (e.g., set to 0 or use a visited set).

4. Analyze Complexity

State time complexity O(mn) and space complexity O(mn) for visited set or O(min(m,n)) for BFS queue in worst case. Discuss potential optimizations.

5. Test and Validate

Walk through small examples (e.g., single building, diagonal buildings, multiple communities) to verify correctness and handle edge cases.

Key Points to Mention

  • Graph traversal (BFS/DFS) or Union-Find for connected components
  • 4-directional adjacency (up, down, left, right)
  • Visited tracking to avoid revisiting cells
  • Time complexity O(mn) and space complexity O(mn) or O(min(m,n))
  • Edge cases: empty grid, no buildings, all buildings connected
  • In-place modification vs. separate visited set

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Follow-up: what if the grid is too large to fit in memory? How would you handle it?

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where I stumbled a bit.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Acknowledge that the in-memory solution won't scale and propose an external memory approach that processes the grid in chunks. Discuss trade-offs between I/O, memory, and computation, and outline a concrete algorithm like external BFS or divide-and-conquer with disk-based storage.

Pro tip: Mention that you would first clarify the grid's characteristics (e.g., sparse vs. dense, access patterns) and the available resources (disk, memory, distributed system) before committing to a solution—this shows you think like a Google engineer who values problem framing.

1. Clarify constraints and assumptions

Ask about grid size, memory limits, disk space, and whether the grid is static or dynamic. Confirm if the problem is BFS/DFS, shortest path, or something else.

2. Choose an external memory strategy

Decide between chunked processing (e.g., block-based BFS) or distributed processing (e.g., MapReduce, Pregel). Consider if the grid can be compressed or represented sparsely.

3. Design the algorithm with I/O efficiency

Outline how to process the grid in blocks, using disk as intermediate storage. For BFS, maintain frontier on disk and process level by level, reading only necessary blocks.

4. Analyze trade-offs and optimizations

Discuss time vs. I/O vs. memory trade-offs. Mention techniques like buffering, prefetching, and compression. Compare with distributed approaches if applicable.

5. Summarize and validate

Recap the approach, highlight its scalability, and note any assumptions. Offer to dive deeper into a specific aspect if needed.

Key Points to Mention

  • External memory algorithms (e.g., external BFS, block-based processing)
  • I/O complexity and minimizing disk reads/writes
  • Distributed processing frameworks (MapReduce, Pregel, Spark)
  • Data compression and sparse representations
  • Trade-offs between memory, disk, and network
  • Real-world examples like Google's web graph processing

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.