← Capital One Interview Insights
My first instinct was the nested loop approach and I even started typing it out before remembering that O(n^2) was going to be a problem on large inputs.
Clarify the problem and constraints, then propose an O(n) single-pass solution that tracks the length of the current alternating run. For each position, add the number of valid subarrays ending there, which is the current run length minus 1 if the run length is at least 2.
Pro tip: Mention that you can optimize to O(1) space by only keeping the current run length, and explicitly handle edge cases like arrays of length 0 or 1. Also, discuss how the solution would change if the array were circular or if the subarrays needed to be of exactly length k.
Restate the problem in your own words and ask clarifying questions about input size, element ranges, and whether the array can be empty. Confirm that 'strictly alternate' means odd-even-odd or even-odd-even.
Start with a brute-force O(n^2) or O(n^3) solution to show understanding, then optimize. Recognize that the property is local: a subarray alternates iff every adjacent pair alternates.
Use a single pass: maintain the length of the current alternating run. For each new element, if it alternates with the previous, increment the run length; otherwise reset to 1. Add (run length - 1) to the count if run length >= 2.
State that the time complexity is O(n) and space is O(1). Walk through edge cases: empty array, single element, all same parity, and alternating array.
Trace the algorithm on a small example like [1,2,3,4] and [1,3,5] to verify correctness. Discuss potential off-by-one errors.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.