← Capital One Interview Insights
The part that got me was that you have to output after EACH insertion, not just at the end.
Use a hash set to track inserted numbers and a hash map to store the length of the consecutive run each number belongs to. For each insertion, check if the number is already present; if not, compute the new run length by combining the left and right neighboring runs, then update the boundaries of the new run. Track the maximum run length seen so far and output it after each insertion.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the solution achieves O(1) average time per insertion by only updating the endpoints of the merged run, and mention that this is crucial for handling large streams efficiently.
Confirm that the stream is processed one integer at a time, duplicates are ignored, and the output is the current longest consecutive run length after each insertion. Discuss edge cases like empty stream, duplicate insertions, and negative numbers.
Select a hash set to track which numbers are present and a hash map to store the length of the consecutive run for each number (only needed at the boundaries). This allows O(1) average-time lookups and updates.
For each new number, if it's already in the set, skip. Otherwise, compute the left run length (map.get(num-1) or 0) and right run length (map.get(num+1) or 0). The new run length is left + right + 1. Update the map for num, num-left, and num+right to the new length.
Maintain a variable for the longest run seen so far, updating it with the new run length after each insertion. After each insertion, output the current longest run length.
State that each insertion takes O(1) average time and O(n) space for the set and map. Walk through the example [2,3,0,4] to verify the outputs [1,2,2,3].
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.