← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round, classic interval scheduling problem with a distributed systems twist at the end. The follow-up about handling massive input was where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a list of meeting time intervals, find the minimum number of conference rooms needed so no two overlapping meetings share a room.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Got through the core solution fine.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem: intervals are half-open [start, end), and we need the maximum number of overlapping meetings at any point. Present the sweep line algorithm: separate starts and ends, sort them, and use two pointers to count concurrent meetings, tracking the maximum. This gives O(n log n) time and O(n) space, which is optimal.

Pro tip: Mention that the minimum number of rooms equals the maximum depth of overlapping intervals, and that this can also be solved with a min-heap in O(n log n) time. Discussing trade-offs between sorting-based and heap-based approaches shows depth.

1. Clarify the problem

Confirm that intervals are half-open [start, end) so that a meeting ending at time t does not conflict with one starting at t. Ask about input size, whether intervals are sorted, and if we need to return the rooms or just the count.

2. Identify the core insight

The minimum number of rooms needed is the maximum number of meetings that overlap at any single point in time. This reduces the problem to finding the maximum overlap count.

3. Choose an algorithm

Use the sweep line approach: extract all start and end times, sort them separately, then use two pointers to simulate time progression. Increment a counter on start, decrement on end, and track the maximum.

4. Analyze complexity and edge cases

The algorithm runs in O(n log n) time due to sorting and O(n) space. Handle edge cases: empty input, single meeting, all meetings overlapping, and meetings that touch at endpoints.

5. Discuss alternatives and trade-offs

Mention the min-heap approach: sort by start time, push end times into a heap, and pop when a meeting ends. Compare trade-offs: sweep line is simpler and uses less memory; heap approach may be more intuitive for some.

Key Points to Mention

  • The problem reduces to finding the maximum number of overlapping intervals at any point.
  • Sweep line algorithm: sort start and end times separately, use two pointers to count active meetings.
  • Time complexity O(n log n) and space complexity O(n) are optimal for comparison-based sorting.
  • Edge cases: empty input, single meeting, all meetings overlapping, and half-open interval semantics.
  • Alternative min-heap approach: sort by start time, use a min-heap of end times to track ongoing meetings.
  • Trade-offs: sweep line is simpler and uses less memory; heap approach may be more intuitive for some.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.