The ID generation part was straightforward, just a counter.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then design a data model with a hash map for case-insensitive name uniqueness and a counter for auto-incremented IDs. Implement CRUD operations with proper error handling, and discuss trade-offs like concurrency and persistence.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a case-insensitive map (e.g., lowercased name as key) to enforce uniqueness efficiently, and consider thread-safety if the service is concurrent. Also, discuss how you would handle ID generation in a distributed system.
Ask about expected scale, concurrency, persistence needs, and whether IDs should be globally unique or per-user. Confirm CRUD operations and uniqueness constraints.
Propose a Recipe class with fields (id, name, ingredients, steps, etc.). Use a hash map to store recipes by ID and another map (or set) to track lowercased names for uniqueness. Maintain a counter for ID generation.
For create: check name uniqueness, generate ID, store recipe. For read: fetch by ID. For update: validate new name uniqueness, update fields. For delete: remove from both maps.
Discuss thread-safety (e.g., synchronized methods or concurrent maps), error handling for duplicate names or missing IDs, and potential race conditions in ID generation.
Mention how to scale (e.g., database with unique index on lowercased name, distributed ID generator) and possible extensions like search, pagination, or versioning.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.