The logic itself isn't hard to reason through but writing it out in C++ is a different story.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a design that uses parallel calls with timeouts and a merge strategy that handles partial failures. Discuss trade-offs between consistency, latency, and complexity, and propose a concrete implementation with error handling and fallback behavior.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and observability: ensure the endpoint can be safely retried and include logging/metrics for partial failures to aid debugging and monitoring.
Ask about expected latency, consistency needs, and failure semantics (e.g., should the endpoint fail if any API fails, or return partial data?).
Decide on parallel vs. sequential calls, timeouts, retries, and how to merge responses (e.g., field-level merging, conflict resolution).
Define behavior when one or more APIs fail: return partial data with error details, use fallbacks, or degrade gracefully with cached data.
Use circuit breakers, bulkheads, and timeouts to prevent cascading failures; ensure idempotency and proper error propagation.
Weigh consistency vs. availability, latency vs. completeness; add logging, metrics, and alerts for partial failures.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.