I started with the pub/sub layer and worked outward, which felt right in the moment but I probably should've clarified the scale assumptions first.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a high-level architecture with decoupled components (API, message queue, workers, storage). Walk through the status update flow end-to-end, and justify storage choices based on access patterns and consistency needs.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and at-least-once delivery to handle duplicate notifications, and discuss how to scale the system horizontally while maintaining low latency.
Ask about expected number of customers, packages, notification channels (email, SMS, push), and latency requirements. Establish consistency and durability needs.
Propose components: API gateway for subscriptions, package status service, message queue (e.g., Kafka/SQS), notification workers, and storage (e.g., DynamoDB for subscriptions, S3 for logs). Explain how they interact.
Describe how a status change triggers an event: package service publishes to queue, workers consume and send notifications. Include retry and dead-letter queue handling.
Justify using a NoSQL database for subscriptions (high read/write, flexible schema) and a relational DB for package status if strong consistency is needed. Discuss caching for frequent reads.
Discuss trade-offs: synchronous vs asynchronous, push vs pull, and how to scale each component. Mention monitoring, metrics, and failure handling.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.