← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
May 2026Remote

Summary

Meta SWE coding round, got a binary array range query problem. Pretty classic prefix sum setup but they pushed on complexity and edge cases more than I expected.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a large immutable binary array, design a data structure that preprocesses it once and then answers range queries for the count of 1s in any inclusive interval [l, r] as efficiently as possible.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

My first instinct was just to scan the range each query, which is obviously too slow at 10^7 elements and 10^5+ queries.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use a prefix sum array where each element at index i stores the cumulative count of 1s from the start up to i. For a query [l, r], return prefix[r] - prefix[l-1] (or prefix[r] if l=0), achieving O(1) query time after O(n) preprocessing. Since the array is immutable, this is optimal and simple.

Pro tip: Mention that the prefix sum array can be built in a single pass and uses O(n) extra space, but if memory is a concern, you could use a bit-packed representation or a Fenwick tree for O(log n) queries with less space—though O(1) is usually preferred. Also, clarify that the array is 0-indexed or 1-indexed as per the problem statement.

1. Clarify the problem and constraints

Confirm the array size, whether indices are 0-based or 1-based, and the expected number of queries. This ensures the solution meets performance requirements.

2. Choose the right data structure

Since the array is immutable and queries are frequent, a prefix sum array is ideal for O(1) query time. Discuss alternatives like Fenwick trees if updates were allowed, but emphasize immutability.

3. Explain preprocessing

Describe how to build the prefix sum array in O(n) time: iterate through the array, maintaining a running sum of 1s, and store it at each index.

4. Define the query operation

For a query [l, r], compute the count as prefix[r] - prefix[l-1] (with prefix[-1] = 0). Handle edge cases like l=0.

5. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

State that preprocessing is O(n), queries are O(1), and space is O(n). Mention that this is optimal for immutable arrays, but if memory is tight, consider a more space-efficient structure like a bit vector with rank/select, though it may have higher constant factors.

Key Points to Mention

  • Prefix sum array construction in O(n) time and O(n) space.
  • O(1) query time for any range [l, r] using prefix[r] - prefix[l-1].
  • Handling of edge cases: l=0, empty range, and large number of queries.
  • Immutability allows for this simple and optimal solution; if updates were allowed, a Fenwick tree or segment tree would be needed.
  • Space-time trade-off: prefix sum uses O(n) extra space; alternative bit-packed structures can reduce space but may increase query time.
  • Correctness: prefix sum works because the array is binary and we are counting 1s, so subtraction gives the count in the range.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.