Seemed easy at first and I jumped straight to using one hashmap.
Use two hash maps to track the bijective mapping between characters of s and t. Iterate through both strings simultaneously, checking that each character in s maps consistently to the corresponding character in t and vice versa. If any inconsistency is found, return false; otherwise, return true.
Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront, such as empty strings or strings with repeated patterns, and mention that the solution runs in O(n) time with O(1) space if the character set is fixed (e.g., ASCII).
Confirm that isomorphic means a one-to-one mapping between characters of s and t, preserving order, and that both strings are of equal length. Ask about character set (e.g., ASCII, Unicode) to determine space complexity.
Use two hash maps (dictionaries) to store mappings from s to t and from t to s. Alternatively, use arrays of size 256 for ASCII to achieve O(1) space.
Loop through each index i, and check if s[i] is already mapped to a different character in t, or if t[i] is already mapped from a different character in s. If either condition fails, return false.
If no conflict, record the mappings s[i] -> t[i] and t[i] -> s[i] in the respective hash maps.
After the loop, return true, indicating the strings are isomorphic. Discuss time and space complexity: O(n) time and O(1) space for fixed character set.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.