I jumped straight into the data model and real-time messaging layer, which felt right, but I spent too long on WebSocket connection handling and barely touched the workspace/channel permission model.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale (e.g., number of users, messages per day, latency, consistency). Then outline a high-level architecture covering real-time messaging, storage, and search, and dive into key components like WebSocket gateways, message queues, and distributed databases. Finally, discuss trade-offs and potential bottlenecks.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of eventual consistency for message ordering and delivery, and propose a hybrid approach using both WebSockets for real-time and HTTP long-polling for fallback. Also, mention how you would handle message search at scale with an inverted index.
Ask about scale (DAU, messages per day), latency requirements, consistency needs, and key features (channels, DMs, threads, search, notifications).
Sketch the main components: clients, WebSocket gateways, message service, presence service, channel service, storage (messages, metadata), and search.
Detail how messages are sent, stored, and delivered: use of message queues (e.g., Kafka) for fan-out, distributed databases (e.g., Cassandra) for message storage, and WebSockets for real-time delivery.
Discuss partitioning (by channel or user), replication, fault tolerance, and how to handle spikes (e.g., auto-scaling WebSocket servers).
Talk about trade-offs: consistency vs. availability, push vs. pull for notifications, and optimizations like caching, CDN for static assets, and search indexing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.