I kind of assumed they wanted me to describe what already exists and then improve on it, but I think that was the wrong instinct.
Start by clarifying the user problem and constraints, then propose a version control system that balances simplicity with power, and finally discuss trade-offs and success metrics. Emphasize how your solution integrates with Google's ecosystem and leverages existing strengths.
Pro tip: Show awareness of Google's existing products like Drive's version history and suggest enhancements rather than reinventing the wheel. Highlight how you'd validate the feature with user research and A/B testing to ensure it meets real needs without overwhelming casual users.
Ask clarifying questions to understand the target users, use cases, and pain points with current version control in Google Docs. Identify what 'version control' means in this context—simple history, branching, merging, or collaborative editing?
Outline the objectives: improve collaboration, reduce errors, increase user satisfaction, etc. Define measurable success metrics such as adoption rate, reduction in version conflicts, or time saved.
Describe a version control system that includes features like named versions, branching, merging, diff view, and rollback. Consider how to make it intuitive for non-technical users while powerful for advanced users.
Discuss trade-offs such as complexity vs. simplicity, performance impact, storage costs, and integration with existing Google infrastructure. Explain how you'd prioritize features based on user impact and effort.
Outline a rollout plan: prototype, user testing, A/B testing, and gathering feedback. Explain how you'd iterate based on metrics and user feedback to refine the feature.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.