← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Multi Round·Junior

JuniorPending
Sep 2026

Summary

Did my Google SWE intern loop and came out of it genuinely unsure how to feel. Round one was rough in patches but round two went well enough that the interviewer said they'd support me, so now I'm just waiting and overthinking it.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Solve a medium-difficulty coding problem that involves handling two distinct conditions, one simpler and one harder, where the harder case can be reduced to the simpler one.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

This is where things got messy.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem and identifying the two conditions. Solve the simpler case first, then show how the harder case can be transformed into the simpler one, and implement the solution with clean code and complexity analysis.

Pro tip: Explicitly state the reduction: 'The harder case can be reduced to the simpler one by...' This shows you can decompose problems and recognize patterns, which is highly valued at Google.

1. Understand and Clarify

Restate the problem in your own words, ask clarifying questions about input/output, constraints, and edge cases. Identify the two conditions and confirm which is simpler.

2. Solve the Simpler Case

Develop an algorithm for the simpler condition, considering brute force and optimal approaches. Analyze time and space complexity.

3. Reduce the Harder Case

Explain how the harder condition can be transformed or reduced to the simpler one. This may involve preprocessing, transforming inputs, or using a different perspective.

4. Implement and Test

Write clean, modular code that handles both cases. Test with examples, edge cases, and discuss potential bugs.

5. Analyze and Optimize

Provide overall time and space complexity. Discuss possible optimizations or trade-offs, and mention any alternative approaches.

Key Points to Mention

  • Clarify the problem and constraints before coding.
  • Identify the simpler and harder conditions explicitly.
  • Explain the reduction from harder to simpler with a clear rationale.
  • Analyze time and space complexity for both cases.
  • Test with edge cases and discuss potential pitfalls.
  • Communicate your thought process clearly and concisely.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Solve a medium-difficulty coding problem, then modify your solution to handle a follow-up variant of the original problem.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Way smoother than round one.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem, constraints, and edge cases, then propose a brute-force solution and optimize it using appropriate data structures and algorithms. After implementing and testing the base solution, analyze the follow-up variant to identify how it differs, and adapt your approach by reusing components or extending the algorithm while discussing trade-offs.

Pro tip: Verbalize your thought process clearly and engage the interviewer as a collaborator—ask clarifying questions and discuss alternative approaches before coding. This demonstrates strong communication and problem-solving skills, which are highly valued at Google.

1. Understand and Clarify

Restate the problem in your own words, ask clarifying questions about input/output, constraints, and edge cases. Confirm your understanding with the interviewer before proceeding.

2. Explore Approaches

Discuss a brute-force solution and its complexity, then propose optimized approaches using suitable data structures or algorithms. Compare trade-offs and select the best one with interviewer buy-in.

3. Implement and Test

Write clean, modular code for the chosen approach. Walk through your code with a sample test case, checking edge cases and fixing any issues.

4. Analyze Follow-Up

Carefully read or listen to the follow-up variant. Identify how it differs from the original (e.g., different constraints, additional operations) and determine what changes are needed.

5. Adapt and Extend

Modify your solution to handle the follow-up, reusing existing code where possible. Discuss the impact on time/space complexity and test the updated solution.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time and space complexity analysis for both original and follow-up solutions
  • Edge cases and how your solution handles them
  • Choice of data structures and why they are optimal
  • Trade-offs between different approaches (e.g., time vs. space)
  • Code modularity and reusability for the follow-up
  • Testing strategy, including unit tests and manual walkthroughs

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.