The brute force part was fine, nested loops, nothing to it.
Start by restating the problem and clarifying assumptions (e.g., elevation map is non-negative, width of each bar is 1). Then walk through the brute-force O(n^2) solution, explain its complexity, and progressively optimize to O(n) time with O(n) space using precomputed max arrays, and finally to O(1) space using two pointers. Emphasize the trade-offs and reasoning at each step.
Pro tip: At Tesla, interviewers value first-principles thinking and efficiency. Explicitly connect the optimization to real-world constraints like memory limits on embedded systems, and mention that the two-pointer approach is often preferred in production due to its constant space.
Confirm the problem: given an array of non-negative integers representing elevation, compute total trapped water. Clarify that each bar has width 1 and water cannot be trapped outside the array.
For each index, find the maximum height to its left and right, then add min(left_max, right_max) - height[i] to the total. Explain that this is O(n^2) time and O(1) space.
Precompute left_max and right_max arrays in two passes, then compute trapped water in a third pass. This reduces time to O(n) at the cost of O(n) extra space.
Use two pointers (left and right) and maintain left_max and right_max variables. Move the pointer with the smaller max inward, adding water based on the smaller max. This achieves O(n) time and O(1) space.
Compare the approaches: brute force is simple but slow; precomputed arrays are faster but use extra memory; two-pointer is optimal for space. Mention edge cases like empty array, single bar, or all bars of equal height.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.