← Bytedance Interview Insights
I went with Kahn's algorithm (BFS-based with in-degree tracking) because I always fumble the DFS post-order version under pressure.
Start by clarifying the problem: confirm the graph is a DAG and discuss whether to return any valid topological order or a specific one. Then present both Kahn's algorithm (BFS-based) and DFS-based topological sort, explaining their trade-offs, and walk through a small example to demonstrate correctness.
Pro tip: Mention that Kahn's algorithm can also detect cycles (if the result size is less than the number of nodes), which is a common follow-up. Also, discuss how to handle large graphs by using iterative DFS to avoid stack overflow.
Confirm that the graph is a DAG, ask about input format (adjacency list or matrix), and whether to return any valid order or a specific one. Discuss edge cases like empty graph, single node, and disconnected components.
Select either Kahn's algorithm (BFS with in-degree tracking) or DFS-based topological sort. Explain the core idea: for Kahn's, repeatedly remove nodes with in-degree 0; for DFS, perform post-order traversal and reverse the result.
Trace the algorithm on a simple DAG (e.g., 5 nodes) to demonstrate how the order is produced. Highlight how in-degrees are updated or how DFS explores and backtracks.
State time and space complexity: O(V+E) for both approaches. Compare them: Kahn's is iterative and detects cycles easily; DFS is simpler but may cause stack overflow for large graphs.
Mention cycle detection, lexicographically smallest topological order (using a min-heap), and handling large graphs with iterative DFS or parallel processing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.