← Bytedance Interview Insights
I went with expand-around-center which is O(n^2) and got it working, but they pushed on whether I knew Manacher's algorithm.
Start by clarifying the problem and edge cases, then present a solution using center expansion, which is intuitive and O(n^2) time. Explain the approach step-by-step, analyze time and space complexity, and discuss trade-offs with other methods like Manacher's algorithm.
Pro tip: Mention Manacher's algorithm as an O(n) alternative but note that center expansion is often preferred in interviews due to simplicity and lower constant factors. This shows you know the optimal solution but can make practical trade-offs.
Ask about input constraints, character set, and whether the substring must be contiguous. Confirm that we need the longest palindromic substring, not subsequence.
Mention that checking all substrings takes O(n^3) time, which is inefficient. This sets the stage for a better approach.
Explain that a palindrome mirrors around its center. For each of the 2n-1 centers (including between characters), expand outward while characters match, tracking the longest.
State that time complexity is O(n^2) because each expansion can take O(n) and there are O(n) centers. Space complexity is O(1) as we only store indices.
Mention Manacher's algorithm for O(n) time but note its complexity. Also, briefly discuss dynamic programming O(n^2) time and space, and why center expansion is often preferred.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.