This was a beast of a question and I don't think I paced it well.
Start by clarifying requirements: expected sensor count, ingestion rate, query patterns, latency needs, and retention. Then propose a high-level architecture using a scalable ingestion pipeline (e.g., Kafka), a time-series database (e.g., TimescaleDB or InfluxDB) for storage and queries, and a stream processor (e.g., Flink) for real-time alerting and rollups. Discuss trade-offs, fault tolerance, and scaling strategies.
Pro tip: Emphasize data modeling choices early: time-partitioned tables with appropriate indexes and downsampling can make or break performance at scale. Also, mention that alerting should be idempotent and deduplicated to avoid alert storms.
Ask about scale (sensors, messages/sec), query types (range, aggregation), latency (ingestion, query, alerting), retention, and consistency needs. This shapes all subsequent design decisions.
Propose a distributed message queue (e.g., Kafka) to buffer and decouple producers from consumers. Ensure it can handle high throughput and provide fault tolerance via replication.
Select a time-series database (e.g., TimescaleDB, InfluxDB) or a wide-column store (e.g., Cassandra) optimized for writes and time-range queries. Model data with time as primary dimension, and consider partitioning and indexing.
Support range queries via time-based indexes. For aggregations and rollups, use pre-aggregation (materialized views or continuous aggregates) and stream processing to compute windows (e.g., 1-min, 1-hour) incrementally.
Use a stream processor (e.g., Flink, Kafka Streams) to evaluate thresholds in real-time, with stateful operators for windowing. Ensure fault tolerance via checkpointing, replication, and idempotent alert delivery.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.