← Bytedance Interview Insights
I went with Union-Find because I've drilled it enough that it feels safer under pressure.
Clarify that a valid tree must be connected and acyclic, then use Union-Find to detect cycles while counting edges, or BFS/DFS to check connectivity and cycle presence. Start by stating the two necessary conditions: exactly n-1 edges and no cycles (or full connectivity).
Pro tip: Mention that if the number of edges is not exactly n-1, you can immediately return false, which is a quick optimization and shows you understand the mathematical property of trees. Also, discuss trade-offs between Union-Find and BFS/DFS in terms of time and space complexity.
Confirm that a valid tree is a connected acyclic undirected graph with exactly n-1 edges. State that if the graph has fewer or more than n-1 edges, it cannot be a tree.
Select either Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union) for cycle detection or BFS/DFS for connectivity and cycle checking. Explain why the chosen method is suitable.
For Union-Find: initialize parent array, iterate edges, union nodes, and if an edge connects nodes already in the same set, a cycle exists. For BFS/DFS: build adjacency list, traverse from node 0, check if all nodes visited and no back edges (except parent).
State time and space complexity: O(n α(n)) for Union-Find, O(n + e) for BFS/DFS. Mention edge cases: n=1 (single node is a tree), disconnected graph, self-loops, and multiple edges.
Summarize that the graph is a valid tree if and only if it has exactly n-1 edges and is connected (or acyclic). Optionally, mention that you can return early if edge count condition fails.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.