← Bitkernel Interview Insights
I stared at this longer than I'd like to admit.
Simulate binary search on the sorted array [180, 200, 450, 500] and track the possible midpoints at each step. For each sequence, verify whether each comparison could be the midpoint of the current search interval, pruning the interval accordingly. The sequence that violates the binary search invariant is the answer.
Pro tip: Remember that binary search always compares the middle element of the current subarray; the first comparison must be either 200 or 450 (the two possible midpoints of the full array). This immediately eliminates sequences starting with 500 or 180, but be careful: some sequences may still be possible if the array size is even and the midpoint choice varies.
Recall that binary search compares the target with the middle element of the current search interval, then discards the half that cannot contain the target. The midpoint is typically floor((low+high)/2).
For the full array of 4 elements (indices 0-3), the middle index is floor((0+3)/2)=1, so the first comparison must be 200. If using a different midpoint convention (e.g., ceiling), it could be 450. Thus, any valid sequence must start with 200 or 450.
For each option, start with the full array and check if the first element matches a possible midpoint. Then update the search interval based on whether the target is less than or greater than the compared key, and continue.
At each step, ensure the compared key is the middle of the current interval. If a sequence requires a comparison that is not the middle of the remaining elements, it cannot occur.
After simulating all sequences, identify the one that violates the binary search invariant. Typically, this is the sequence that starts with an element that cannot be the first midpoint.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.