← Bytedance Interview Insights
Took me a minute to realize this is a DP problem.
Clarify the problem constraints and define the DP state, then derive the recurrence and optimize if needed. Walk through a small example to validate the approach and discuss time/space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that the naive O(n^2) DP can be optimized to O(n log n) using a segment tree or Fenwick tree, showing you think beyond the basic solution.
Confirm the problem details: subsequence preserves order, adjacent selected videos must satisfy duration sum ≤ A, and we maximize total duration. Ask about constraints (n, A, duration values) to determine required efficiency.
Let dp[i] be the maximum total watch time for a valid subsequence ending at index i. Initialize dp[i] = duration[i] for all i.
For each i, dp[i] = duration[i] + max(dp[j]) over all j < i such that duration[j] + duration[i] ≤ A. If no such j, dp[i] = duration[i]. The answer is max(dp[i]).
The naive O(n^2) DP may be too slow. Optimize by processing indices in order and using a segment tree or Fenwick tree keyed by duration to query the maximum dp[j] for durations ≤ A - duration[i] in O(log n) time.
State time complexity: O(n log n) with optimization, O(n^2) without. Space: O(n). Discuss edge cases: no valid pairs, all durations > A, negative durations (if allowed), and large input sizes.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Recognize that with repetitions allowed and exactly m videos to watch, the problem becomes selecting a sequence of m videos (with possible repeats) that respects the adjacency constraint and maximizes total watch time. Model it as a dynamic programming problem where state includes the last watched video and the number of videos watched so far, then optimize transitions using techniques like max-plus matrix exponentiation or DP with prefix maxima to handle large m efficiently.
Pro tip: Mention that if m is very large, you can use matrix exponentiation (max-plus algebra) to achieve O(n^3 log m) time, but if m is moderate, a simple DP with prefix maxima works; always clarify constraints before choosing the approach.
Confirm that repetitions are allowed, exactly m videos must be watched, and the adjacency constraint (e.g., cannot watch the same video twice in a row) still applies. The goal is to maximize total watch time.
Let dp[i][j] be the maximum total watch time after watching i videos ending with video j. The recurrence is dp[i][j] = watch_time[j] + max_{k != j} dp[i-1][k], with base case dp[1][j] = watch_time[j].
For each i, compute the top two maximum values of dp[i-1][k] to efficiently get max_{k != j} dp[i-1][k] in O(1) per j, reducing the overall DP to O(m * n) time.
If m is very large (e.g., up to 10^9), represent the DP transition as a max-plus matrix multiplication and use exponentiation to compute the result in O(n^3 log m) time.
Compare the O(m*n) DP approach with the O(n^3 log m) matrix exponentiation, discussing when each is preferable based on constraints and implementation complexity.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.